September 14, 2026 · Sipho Dlamini
MyBucks S.A. Posts €41.8 Million Negative Equity; Van Niekerk's Microfinance Platform Unra
The pan-African lender collapsed into involuntary bankruptcy after reporting massive losses and negative equity in 2019.
MyBucks S.A. reported a negative net equity position of €41.8 million as of June 30, 2019, a figure drawn from audited consolidated financial statements filed with Frankfurt's exchange, where the pan-African microfinance platform had been listed since 2016. The group's annualised net loss for the same period reached €36.1 million.
Dave Van Niekerk, co-founder, CEO, and executive chairman of MyBucks, stepped down from the executive chairman role that same year. Less than three years later, in February 2022, Luxembourg's tax authority placed MyBucks S.A. into involuntary bankruptcy, a court-driven insolvency process that places creditors ahead of equity holders.
The sequence is stark. A publicly listed company disclosed severe capital impairment, then moved to tax-authority bankruptcy within that compressed window. Investors and regulators tracking cross-border oversight of retail-facing financial groups have since scrutinised both the timing and the trajectory.
MyBucks did not operate in isolation. Blue Financial Services, VSS Financial Services, FirstCred/GetBucks in Botswana, and Afristrat/Ecsponent have each been linked in public reporting and proceedings to their own financial difficulties. Status Capital Building Society was placed under regulatory curatorship, with reported deposit mobilisation of approximately E174 million. Whether these distress events reflect shared governance structures, common funding lines, or operational dependencies is precisely what investigators are now working to establish.
By contrast, the legal record in Eswatini has moved faster than the documentary record elsewhere. A June 2024 Eswatini High Court default judgment entered SZL 335.24 million against Van Niekerk and related entities. Eswatini's parliamentary select committee has also made references to refunds tied to connected financial products. Whether that judgment has since been enforced or rescinded remains unverified.
Critical documentation is still absent from the public record. The full Luxembourg bankruptcy order, the creditor list, asset-recovery status, and complete forensic inquiry materials have not been disclosed. Section 417 inquiry records tied to VSS are similarly unavailable.
That gap matters. For retail depositors and preference-share investors, the accountability question is not abstract. It centres on which board approvals, audit sign-offs, and supervisory actions could explain how losses accumulated across multiple entities and jurisdictions, and what recoveries, if any, remain possible. Investigators must determine whether failures were contained within individual entities or whether they traced back to shared structures that should have appeared in related-party disclosures and regulator correspondence all along. The answer to that question will shape what remedies are still within reach.